Sunday, April 27, 2025

Pleasantly surprised

 A woman on social media asked the following question:


I was not expecting much illumination in the replies. In our times, masculinity is often described as toxic or else it is redefined as being something much more akin to the feminine. So I was pleasantly surprised when one woman proffered the following list:


It's not a bad list. It could be added to, but it does capture aspects of the masculine personality. What's especially surprising is that this woman is not anything like a traditionalist. Though married, she is generally critical of men, and she has a materialistic, transactional view of relationships (her husband is supposed to enable the luxurious lifestyle she desires). Her life aim is to always get what she wants, and though she wants children she denigrates the motherhood role as being beneath her:


Some of the women in the discussion then challenged her to come up with a list of feminine traits. Again, she immediately produced a set of qualities that does seem to capture aspects of the feminine personality:


I would query the idea of magnanimity as being a more feminine quality, but apart from that it seems like a reasonable effort to me.

Just a couple of further points. First, if you read the social media timeline of this woman, she is at the most disagreeable end of the female personality spectrum. This makes her come across badly, but it has the benefit of allowing her to speak her mind freely, which perhaps explains why she did not just resort to the usual liberal platitudes when this topic was raised.

Second, a few thoughts occur to me regarding female sensitivity. This is a quality that can have both negative and positive expressions. On the negative side of the ledger, women can sometimes be overly sensitive to criticism. It can be a tough job for a husband to criticise his wife. No matter how diplomatically he frames the criticism, the response can be something along the lines of "This is a day that will live in infamy...." Similarly, women can be overly sensitive to tone, and can overdo the "tone policing" at times.

Nonetheless, sensitivity is part of the making of a woman. Women can be sensitive to the moods and emotions of others, which then supports their ability to nurture. There is a connection too, I think, between a sensitivity of feeling and a delicacy of manners and mores in women. You notice this sometimes in women who are more brashly insensitive - there is not the refinement that you normally expect in a feminine personality. Finally, men respond to women who are at least a little more emotionally sensitive than themselves. This is part of the quality of expressiveness listed above. It might lead a woman to react more emotionally, for instance, to a sad scene in a film or to express compassion for a person or animal in distress. When done well, it balances men's greater level of emotional reserve.

4 comments:

  1. “aesthetic sense” is feminine? No. The greatest artists, sculptors, architects, composers and chefs are men.

    ReplyDelete
  2. What on earth is "linear thinking"?

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think you could say women are more aesthetically senstitive, in general. Compare houseproud wives to bachelors.
    And as she alluded to with 'ambition', men are more prone to obsession or autistic tunnel vision, which could be where the composers and chefs come from.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think this is basically right. There are domains in which women's aesthetic sense comes through more strongly than men's. The home environment is a clear example. Clothes and fashion. Flowers. Men do dominate in fields like composing music or poetry. This could partly be due to ambition/single-mindedness. But also perhaps men's orientation to the vertical structure - i.e., the art/music is an aspect of a drive toward the transcendent.

      Delete