Wednesday, July 03, 2013

A trad manifesto

Mark Moncrieff has put together a traditionalist manifesto at his site. Have a look and see what you think.

4 comments:

  1. As a bioregionalist techno-distributist, seeing a traditionalist lay it out like that is very helpful in understanding why I diverge so much from traditionalists in my practical, tactical inclinations.

    There are some areas of very strong affinity, but his document is fundamentally a strategic, abstract one and I think traditionalists could move on to practical, tactical documents, but that sense is precisely what makes me a bioregionalist distributist.

    Most bioregionalists are really far from identifying with traditionalism, but structuring your economy to optimize the resources of your bio-region so that you can support large populations for centuries on end is at its core a traditionalist sort of problem, as it's focused on posterity and centering people in the environment, not animals and weird plants.

    Likewise, I am a techno-distributist because I believe that traditional families and communities have a big opportunity to build themselves up into sustainable parallel societies with local, patriarchally directed authority having primacy with the aid of some of these technological advances we've got.

    Thus, I look at that manifesto and think 'We have the tools to move beyond this sort of abstract polemic', but I also think 'Having said that, this gives something to respond to, as all the points are in one big list'. Which is useful in its way.

    Perhaps it is simply a male-female difference. Women are always concerned about the practical when it comes down to it.

    --Mrs. Johnson

    ReplyDelete
  2. Mrs Johnson,

    I don't think it's so much that you diverge from traditionalists in your practical, tactical inclinations but that a manifesto like Mark's is more concerned to set out larger political beliefs and values.

    In terms of "what are traditionalists ultimately aiming for" I think there is no settled opinion right now. My own approach is a dual one: I'd like traditionalists to build the kind of institutions within mainstream society that will challenge liberal orthodoxy, but I'd also like to see a trad community consolidated somewhere in Australia.

    But for either thing to happen you need to build up a movement of people who have broken decisively with the liberal orthodoxy. And that break isn't easy - the draw of an American style right-liberalism on people on the right is very strong - so political clarity is important right now.

    (BTW, thanks for your interesting comment.)

    ReplyDelete
  3. I liked the manifesto except one part - does it imply society should discriminate against gay persons? Personally, while I am quite traditional I do have a live and let live policy. Something I have to think about. (I am not gay and have a spouse who believes in traditional values too with family as the core, I am 30 she is 26). Maybe there is a generational difference in outlooks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The fact that the manifesto in question repeatedly uses "it's", where grammatical rules require "its", is most unfortunate. It conveys the impression of illiteracy.

    ReplyDelete