She posted the following as a Twitter thread, but I'm condensing it for readability:
A Dear Joan Letter to Feminism:There is a genre of this kind of writing - of middle-aged women without families feeling dudded by feminism (which I hereby dub "feminist regret"). One of the earliest examples that I recall was written by an Australian journalist, Virginia Haussegger, back in 2002 - see here.
I’m mad that you took away my right to choose what I wanted as a woman...you took things too far when you pushed me out of my natural nurturing role & into a man’s world. The expectation to strive & succeed amongst men killed my femininity, thank you FEMINISM!
Why did you have to go & steal my hopes & dreams from me? You’re selfish & never cared enough about what I really wanted to even ask me first. Maybe I didn’t want to spend 18 years in post-grad school when I would’ve rather been prioritizing prospects for finding a good partner.
I would’ve never let you swindle me out of my prime years in the name of progress. I would’ve rather used my god-given gifts on what is truly important to me. My PhD can’t defend me in an attack or keep me safe from harm. It doesn’t even guarantee that I’ll be financially robust.
Sure, it’s impressive to other women in the game of competition, but what the hell are we competing for? Men don’t care that I have a PhD, in fact, it limits my options in the dating pool. It’s like height, I’m tall & average height men are mainly out of the market for me.
I can’t pair with a man beneath me, literally and figuratively. You forgot to discuss this temper tantrum you had decades ago with your older sister HYPERGAMY. If you had, she would have put you in your place a long time ago. But you had to go rogue and try to prove your point.
I just can’t believe I let you manipulate me into neglecting my feminine ideals & self-sabotaging to the point that I may have set myself up for being alone without any family of my own while I help other people find & keep their happy lives with their families.
I know somewhere along the way you thought you were right for doing what you did, but I need you to stop and reconsider things now. I can’t go back and redo my 20s or even go back to puberty and start my socialization over so that I understand male/female dynamics realistically.
My life may be irreversible now, and I’ll have to make peace with the consequences of what you did. But I know you’re still out there doing this to other people. I’m just asking you to stop for the sake of love and family values. Let women be women again.
And for goodness sake let men be men! If there’s anything I can say to appeal to your senses, this is it: thank you for showing me I am powerful & smart when I need to be. I will take that with me. It’s just not the whole story. I need to respect, honor & admire a partner.
This is what I needed to learn:
1. Men are awesome creatures when they are at their best & I need one in my life to love & keep me safe and ensure a healthy & happy home & life.
2. Find a man that inspires your whole being so that even when you disagree, you defer to his leadership.
3. There is no need to rebel against his leadership if I choose wisely. And when I do, know that “the ship has sailed” and we are on course for a lifetime of adventure together. We can strategize our teamwork to plan according to all the challenges at sea, but we must not waver.
4. Being feminine is everything. Denying our beauty is a sin on humanity. Embrace & celebrate your inner & outer sensual essence by being graceful, selective, kind, joyful, warm, loving & intuitive. You can do so without being weak or meek or insignificant.
5. I was put on this earth to love and to heal and to help and support someone, my someone! There is no progress without leadership, there is no leadership without followership, there is no home without a healthy system to guide & protect it and there is no love without a home.
Enough FEMINISM, you have done enough damage...You’ve proven your twisted point. If you carry on any further you are going to destroy life & love as we (used to) know it. Women will rule the world with subservient masses of weak men. Then what? Will you stop then?
Will you be happy when you look around at the mess you’ve created and smile? I don’t think so! I think you’ll wail like you’ve never felt sadness and despair before once you understand what you’ve “created.” The destruction will be catastrophic...it’s already begun.
But it’s not too late for our future even if it’s too late for some. So, I beg you FEMINISM: Enough! You’ve had your run, let go of the death grip and listen to your inner voice. I know you still have it. You don’t have to fight anymore. I’m sorry if you're hurt by my leaving.
But I’m done.
All the best,
The generations of women from who you squandered youth and the Divine Feminine for too long.
Dr Taylor Burrowes' letter is better than many I've read. I like the following aspects:
1. She recognises that men aren't very attracted to a woman's professional qualifications.
2. She recognises the reality of female hypergamy: that women feel attracted to men who they can look up to in some way. Therefore, both her height and her PhD limited the pool of men she might have successfully bonded with. She writes "I can’t pair with a man beneath me, literally and figuratively." This has implications for how society is organised - care has to be taken to ensure that men have the standing in society to attract their female peers.
3. She doesn't do the "men can't handle smart/strong women" shtick. She acknowledges that the problem was internal to her and that it would have helped if she had been brought up to better understand the male/female dynamic.
4. She does a good job in identifying the qualities that women might cultivate in themselves. She suggests that women aim to be "graceful, selective, kind, joyful, warm, loving & intuitive".
5. She is open and honest about needing a man to lead in the relationship. She associates a man leading and protecting with the creation of a loving home (leadership includes teamwork between man and woman).
Finally, I hope that the men reading this don't respond with a "white knight" instinct, because it is not what women like Dr Taylor Burrowes are looking for. She is not looking for a servant to uphold the feminine imperative, i.e. to do her bidding. She wants a masculine man who can more than hold his own in a relationship. Who she feels confident in deferring to for leadership. It is not a case of "rescue" but of being a man who can be relied on to make good decisions and to steer things in the right direction.
A note to Melbourne readers. If you are sympathetic to the ideas of this website, please visit the site of the Melbourne Traditionalists. It's important that traditionalists don't remain isolated from each other; our group provides a great opportunity for traditionalists to meet up and connect. Details at the website.
Brilliant! I think I shall keep a copy of this to read to my daughter when she is old enough to understand.ReplyDelete
Feminism has gone so far as to obfuscate this truth. Any man, today, who dare emulate Dr Burrowes sentiment will be derided as a misogynist. I have heard female coworkers rip into men who dare suggest nurturing and child rearing are something women should be doing.
My own sentiment is that the economic woman is fundamentally self-centred, having lost a key attribute of the sacrificial love that goes into motherhood. And: when women are in the marketplace competing with men, child rearing becomes an afterthought, something that gets in the way of economic success. The number of women I’ve heard disparage mothering and children is disheartening. In this scenario women will come to loathe their lack of success AND the impediment of children and family. And children, and women, will be the biggest losers of all. And men, as they now “fail to launch”, as the likes of Warren Farrell would say.
When I was a kid, our society was a child-centred one. Adults sacrificed themselves to the task of raising a well-adjusted next generation.
Excellent. The only fault I found with it is her identifying being "meek" (i.e. the quiet and gentle spirit women should cultivate) as a negative thing when in fact this should be a goal for women. Of course, this is a Christian teaching and it's unclear if she is a Christian.ReplyDelete
Overall, very good.
And the omission of sexual experience (which is understandable since she's writing non-anonymously on twitter- wouldn't expect such embarassing things to be discussed in an open letter). Pair bonding for both sexes is damaged by female unchastity. The women can't pair bond properly with or be attracted to the guy she marries and the man can't fully and continously love the woman since it feels like she isn't his and his alone.ReplyDelete
I really feel bad for the lady. She seems very intelligent and has the best qualities for motherhood.ReplyDelete
Unfortuntely the battle with feminism will only end when women return to having traditional values and we undo some of the laws, like rewarding women for divorcing men.
The game is rigged for men so we are staying clear. It is hurting as both but women who want to be mothers and cannot find a man to commit are clearly in a terrible spot.