tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post7667880294368540441..comments2024-03-25T19:48:24.624+11:00Comments on Oz Conservative: The third degree of hostilityUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-59967227683891948832014-06-08T01:22:08.977+10:002014-06-08T01:22:08.977+10:00Just like how George Zimmerman was half Hispanic, ...Just like how George Zimmerman was half Hispanic, the media chooses to focus on "white person" aspect. If Obama does something bad, will it be because of his white part?<br />The media also focuses on how much he hated women, yet they omit or ignore that he repeatedly stabbed those men far more times than necessary to kill them, suggesting a greater rage towards them than the women.<br />If he'd shot the women and then proceeded to stab their dead bodies, I'd possibly agree with them, but they just ignore that piece of information.<br />Anyone who has studied serial killers knows that a person who is stabbed far more than needed to kill them is clearly the subject of a greater rage than someone who was shot from a moving car.<br />Want to know how little western countries care about the deaths of males? Just read <a href="http://www.news.com.au/national/nsw-act/short-stint-in-jail-for-woman-who-killed-partner-by-cutting-off-his-penis/story-fndo4bst-1226460649450" rel="nofollow">this article about an Asian man who died after having his penis cut off by his ex in 2011.</a><br />The circumstances were nearly identical to the case in the USA where a woman did the same thing (drugged him, tied him to a bed, cut off his penis) only the man in the case in Australia died of his injuries and the woman responsible will be free and back on the streets in November this year.<br />The truth is that the men Elliot Rodger killed weren't white, so the feminist agenda will only recognize the (white) women who were killed.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-13957510484366959272014-06-03T06:40:48.116+10:002014-06-03T06:40:48.116+10:00Another good post, Mark. And here is a humorous t...Another good post, Mark. And here is a humorous take on the reactions to the event:<br /><br />http://mindhacks.com/2013/09/21/this-complex-and-tragic-event-supports-my-own-view/CamelCaseRobnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-56935678753055397842014-06-03T04:36:37.591+10:002014-06-03T04:36:37.591+10:00If Mr. Rodger was an exponent of "patriarchy,...If Mr. Rodger was an exponent of "patriarchy," he would have been angry that he could not find a wife with whom he could father children and found a family, with himself at its head. The fathering of children and the founding of male-headed families is, after all, the defining aim of an aspiring patriarch. As it was, Mr. Rogers appears to have been angry that he could not find a <i>girlfriend</i> who would give him orgasms and flattery, orgasms and flattery being the meat and potatoes of a postmodern narcissist.<br /><br />If Mr. Rodgers was an exponent of racism and white privilege, he would not have been so eager to kill blondes. If there is a racial angle to this wretched story, it is to be found in the inability of what used to be known as a "half breed" to fit into the ethnic or racial identity of either of his parents' peoples. This appears to have been compounded by an unattractive personality. In any case, I've read nothing that suggests that he felt entitled to a girlfriend because he was (half) white; everything suggests that he felt entitled to a girlfriend because he was, in his own eyes, a "consummate gentleman" with a BMW and a pair of two-hundred-dollar sunglasses.<br /><br />I think we should be very hesitant to draw large cultural meanings from freak events, particularly when they appear to provide "yet more evidence" for some proposition that we already believe is true. Leave it to lefties to find in every evil more evidence that the world needs more leftism. We traditionalists should not assert that Eliot Rodgers could not have happened in a patriarchal society, but we can say that a patriarchal society would have disapproved of Eliot Rodgers long before he plunged a knife into his first roommate. JMSmithnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-74737918359057818502014-06-03T01:34:40.329+10:002014-06-03T01:34:40.329+10:00"To describe a man as a patriarch of his comm..."To describe a man as a patriarch of his community ought to be considered a very great compliment." <br /><br />So true. Drawing from my own family experience, when I was very young my paternal grandfather served as the family patriarch. He was the glue that held the family together. When he was around, we celebrated holidays together and my extended family was around pretty regularly. We were a traditional family. However, he passed away when I was relatively young and almost instantly our family disintegrated. There was no patriarch to replace him (this is partially due to the fact that he didn't raise a patriarch to replace him), and so the family gets together less often, and even when it does it is invariably piecemeal. No big family get-togethers. No repeating of the family lore. Little mutual support structure. The family went from being almost invariably religious to confused questioners, especially among my generation. <br /><br />This is a story that probably is repeated in way too many people's lives as an older generation dies off where liberalism had quite taken so much hold on our ordinary lives, even those of liberals, which my grandfather most certainly was. This is leaving people without direction or belonging. Thankfully, most don't turn to violence, but many turn to self-destructive behaviors that are more socially destructive in the aggregate. Casual sex, drug use, and other self-destructive behaviors are not as big of an issue in a world with strong families and churches. nate895https://www.blogger.com/profile/05539361477170574108noreply@blogger.com