tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post7217839874984446986..comments2024-03-25T19:48:24.624+11:00Comments on Oz Conservative: Roebuck on women and marriageUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-84318913653737487232013-05-15T02:55:46.868+10:002013-05-15T02:55:46.868+10:00This is a very good piece. At least I like it.
I ...This is a very good piece. At least I like it.<br /><br />I see a problem though. He tells the man who is under threat of divorce to do practically anything his wife tells him to do, and while doing so always to appear strong.<br /><br />To whom must he appear strong? To his wife.<br /><br />She, not he, will decide if his appearance is convincingly strong.<br /><br />There are some other problems that appear in the comments.<br /><br />James A. Donald: "Of course another problem, especially with military husbands, is the cash and prizes aspect of divorce – that the woman gets the money upfront. Thus if a thrifty husband marries a spendthrift wife, whose focus is on the short term, he is apt to be divorced for short tem cash rewards regardless of income."<br /><br />That's on the mark. I don't blame Roebuck for having no answer to it, of course.<br /><br />jamesd127: "Our race, nation, our culture, our religion, are all subject to the power of people who intend to end it, and cannot continue if their power continues."<br /><br />That's also on the mark, and Alan Roebuck goes out of his way not to agree with it. Again though, the problem is so big I don't blame anyone for not having a solution.Daybreakernoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-69687658841530909142013-05-13T22:27:55.107+10:002013-05-13T22:27:55.107+10:00Laura Wood's discussion on Roebuck's post ...Laura Wood's <a href="http://www.thinkinghousewife.com/wp/2013/05/why-marry-a-response-to-the-manosphere/#more-53973" rel="nofollow">discussion</a> on Roebuck's post at her blog is particularly good reading also.buckyinkynoreply@blogger.com