tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post5412252356529801913..comments2024-03-25T19:48:24.624+11:00Comments on Oz Conservative: A Jeongian analysisUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger16125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-20836282110641635242018-08-17T11:27:30.917+10:002018-08-17T11:27:30.917+10:00Don't ignore the role of christian ngos in kee...Don't ignore the role of christian ngos in keeping them down here's an example.<br /><br />http://yugaparivartan.com/2018/05/30/sterlite-protests-development-hits-minority-roadblock/Jatthttp://jatt.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-88808068411349355292018-08-17T09:39:55.196+10:002018-08-17T09:39:55.196+10:00Having a female leader, even female university stu...Having a female leader, even female university students being a majority, does not create feminism. Feminism is a specific legal policy aimed at achieving "gender equality". This is distinct from the cultural phenomenon of Western feminism. It must be specifically enacted to work, it cannot be created via the private sector because it relates to the enforcement of contracts and law via the courts. Birth rates have actually fallen in most Third World countries, Africa south of the Sahara is the main exception. One reason family breakdown has not been as severe in the Third World is because the courts are still influenced by a traditionalist culture (see Japan where the constitution was written by American liberals and ignored by the conservative Japanese judges) and in some countries don't use the Western legal systems.Timnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-75007181717134004152018-08-13T21:52:34.796+10:002018-08-13T21:52:34.796+10:00"The end of colonialism was supposed to heral..."The end of colonialism was supposed to herald in these nations rising to First World living standards"<br /><br />The end of colonialism was supposed to allow the natives to regain control of their own countries and end the foreign occupation of their lands and expropriation of their wealth. It was never intended to lead to First World status. Most of the natives who recall the British Empire actually preferred living under the British who provided law and order and security. It was the native elites who wanted independence and got it and shortly afterwards massive political and economic corruption followed. The concept of independence is relative however, as most of the Third World is massively indebted to the major Western financial institutions and their governments effectively western puppets.<br /><br />What do you mean by promoting feminism in the Third World? Most of the Third World already has universal suffrage (India is the world's largest democracy) and most of the countries have female politicians and many have female presidents ( all of the countries of the Indian subcontinent have had female rulers, Philippines, Burma, Thailand, Hong Kong). The Muslim states of Pakistan and Bangladesh had female presidents. Most have been dynastic rulers but nevertheless still won elections.<br /><br />Most Third World countries have 50% female students in urban universities, even Muslim Pakistan, Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia have universities with medical and law schools exclusively for women. Most Third World countries have high rates of female employment from agriculture in rural areas to medicine, law and business in the urban areas and many export their women to work in the Middle East. It doesn't lead to divorce or illegitimacy or falling birth rates. The family is still strong. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-67143127751769678372018-08-13T12:14:25.830+10:002018-08-13T12:14:25.830+10:00A good example here:
https://twitter.com/matthewa...A good example here:<br /><br />https://twitter.com/matthewasears/status/1028821316479139840<br /><br />It speaks much about the arrogance of liberals that they believe it is they who are the moral arbiters of what is allowed and what is not. (remember when liberals said you can't legislate morality) Even mild right-liberalism is considered "hate speech"<br />Timnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-16013058797076808102018-08-12T23:45:25.463+10:002018-08-12T23:45:25.463+10:00That's called ethnic conflict.
IT only happ...That's called ethnic conflict. <br /><br />IT only happens when you have 'diversity' to begin with. Pattern is the same everywhere: 1. Let us in. 2. We want to take over and destroy you.<br /><br />Solution is to prevent or reverse step 1.<br /><br />cecilhenryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06295507329028875050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-12088593699170049982018-08-12T11:20:25.096+10:002018-08-12T11:20:25.096+10:00Jordan Peterson is very comfortable with group ide...Jordan Peterson is very comfortable with group identity.<br /><br />Just not White group identity. ITs striking.<br /><br />He spends a lot of time now with Jews who explicitly advance Jewish interests and identity and completely ignores it. Something is very wrong there.<br /><br />https://www.eurocanadian.ca/2018/03/jordan-peterson-postmodernist-critic-white-identitarians.html#morececilhenryhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06295507329028875050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-44365869584280192672018-08-12T05:09:54.412+10:002018-08-12T05:09:54.412+10:00Well said Anonymous. "feminism... is essentia...Well said Anonymous. "feminism... is essentially a reaction by women to the observable fact that their men were weak and unable to provide the security they needed. The second... "immigrants... detest [t]his weakness in handing everything over to them", and "White men could stop this immediately", but they won't, since the weakness is manifest to everyone; it's practically a white manifesto. <br />Buck Onoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-38324549740373390152018-08-12T03:54:43.021+10:002018-08-12T03:54:43.021+10:00Economic inequality between the First and Third Wo...Economic inequality between the First and Third Worlds is the root cause of immigration. The end of colonialism was supposed to herald in these nations rising to First World living standards, but this has not happened outside of East Asia. Even the end of the superpower-driven "brushfire wars" hasn't resulted in these countries reaching Second World status. So entire academic departments exist to explain away these disparities as the fault of capitalism, or an insidious white racist conspiracy. <br /><br />Any regaining of our sovereignty is going to come at a heavy cost, likely requiring payment of vast sums for immigrants to repatriate and for more immigrants to not come. Our sentiments against immigration are easily attacked by liberals and socialists as selfish base desires against "harder-working" competition, and also as "karmic retribution" for imperialism. <br /><br />From a Machiavellian perspective, promoting feminism in the Third World is of tremendous benefit to us. How successful it could be I am not sure, and I certainly would not want it to be. Immigrants often wire back significant portions of their income, becoming "Big Men" in their ancestral village, which if anything tends to reduce feminism by raising their SMV.<br />Timnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-48403808140976352952018-08-12T03:40:23.964+10:002018-08-12T03:40:23.964+10:00I notice a tendency of liberals to prefer that tra...I notice a tendency of liberals to prefer that traditionalists should act in a closeted manner and not "pollute" public discourse by causing "division".<br /><br />Liberals are actually angrier at traditionalists of their own ethnic group. We are seen to have "betrayed the tribe" by rejecting liberal ideals. It's tribalism in service of deracination. <br /><br />By contrast left-liberals never display this level of animus against a traditionalist Muslim, and right-liberals never display animus against Chinese state-owned industries.<br />Timnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-72162874089005929342018-08-11T20:25:35.951+10:002018-08-11T20:25:35.951+10:00This brings to mind the emphasis placed by Jordan ...<em>This brings to mind the emphasis placed by Jordan Peterson on the idea that there should be no pride or status found within a group identity and that only a pride in individual achievement is to be permitted.</em><br /><br />But the elites seem to have enormous pride and status as a result of their membership of the elite class. Which is a group identity. And it's not dependent on individual achievement - merely being accepted as as member of the elite class is enough.dfordoomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02306293859869179118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-35674013805822939112018-08-11T17:27:08.321+10:002018-08-11T17:27:08.321+10:00I'm not so sure that the anti-white commentary...I'm not so sure that the anti-white commentary from Asians is a way in. I was a wedding photographer interacting in a pretty jovial familier way with thousands of people from many ethnic groups, in other words they said what they thought. The thing I could see was that each and every ethnic group thought they were the best, you won the jackpot being born Lebanese or Vietnamese or Serbian or anything. The same thing goes for races, religions and sexual groups like gays. They all think they're the best and even that the others, the non gays, the non Japanese, non Jews are jealous. When the Russians arrived I heard only stories about how dangerous, pitiless and hard life was as a Russian and that no other nationality had life spirit and culture as wonderful as a Russian. And each group has a sense of injustice coming from not being on the top of the pile where they belong. I think that's where the resentment towards higher achieving nationalities and religions comes from. The amount of resentment is an individual thing depending on whether an individual is the grateful type. I heard plenty of people get up and say how wonderful Australia is and that they were blessed to be here but for the not so grateful it's a feeling that they and their fellows belong on the top and someone should do something about it.Davenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-6924475971357891542018-08-10T22:14:13.714+10:002018-08-10T22:14:13.714+10:00Group identity as practiced by the left is prescri...<i>Group identity as practiced by the left is prescriptive and merely a tactic to ultimately atomize / individualize people</i><br /><br />Good point.Mark Richardsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15961688379656119701noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-15177274502012391512018-08-10T22:12:42.997+10:002018-08-10T22:12:42.997+10:00what happens when the low-status perennially oppre...<i>what happens when the low-status perennially oppressed forget that it's a signalling device and start to take it literally?</i><br /><br />Yes, the problem is not just that it's a demented way for a white person to status signal, but that it's extraordinarily dangerous as well - it feeds an animosity toward whites at a time of demographic shift.Mark Richardsonhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15961688379656119701noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-47227776350060804172018-08-10T21:48:20.697+10:002018-08-10T21:48:20.697+10:00I don't think that virtue signalling is entire...I don't think that virtue signalling is entirely the reason for the observed phenomenon of anti- white rhetoric. At a more fundamental level, in the human psyche weakness in the other is deplored and invites aggression and contempt toward the other. Men are they key to society as the upholders of its tradition, religion and culture, ethnic roots and land and wealth and its defenders from internal and external aggressors. The Victorian writer Anthony Trollope noted the weakness of the Anglo Saxon male in the 19th century describing many of his male characters as domesticated pets. The general weakness and softness of the males of a society has profound consequences. Weak males do not command respect and they invite contempt and aggression towards the. The first consequence of this was feminism which is essentially a reaction by women to the observable fact that their men were weak and unable to provide the security they needed. The second consequence was the subversion of the anglo countries by aliens from both within and without as immigration steadily increased. Immigrants, facing no opposition, and have stealthily gained more wealth, power and ultimately control over the host societies. Immigrants do not respect the countries of the white man, they detest his weakness in handing everything over to them.<br /><br />White men could stop this immediately by concerted action to force immigrants to leave and regain control of their countries. Hungary has done it, Italy is doing it but the Anglo Saxon culture with its rampant individualism and materialism makes this difficult as each man is out for himself and himself alone. And a single man cannot fight an organised force.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-4653044802788921762018-08-10T19:54:48.964+10:002018-08-10T19:54:48.964+10:00The problem is - what happens when the low-status ...The problem is - what happens when the low-status perenially opressed forget that it's a signalling device and start to take it literally?<br /><br />I am also somewhat baffled by Petersons position. Group identity as practiced by the left is prescriptive and merely a tactic to ultimately atomize / individualize people. As such what's needed is definitely not more individualism, but an appreciation for authentic descriptive group identity.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-60634288885398193232018-08-09T23:00:55.339+10:002018-08-09T23:00:55.339+10:00Colin Liddel wrote something similar but in a more...Colin Liddel wrote something similar but in a more insightful and cutting way "Sarah Jeong wants to be white".<br /><br />But certainly a lot of this stuff is intra-white status signalling, it's amazing to me that anyone who has spent any time around upper middle class professional whites would fail to see this.Vic Stampnoreply@blogger.com