tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post4912967142719366445..comments2024-03-25T19:48:24.624+11:00Comments on Oz Conservative: She wears a suit to work so it must be OK!Unknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger29125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-33840395560824019452007-08-05T13:03:00.000+10:002007-08-05T13:03:00.000+10:00Here is something from the Australian Bureau of St...Here is something from the <I>Australian Bureau of Standards</I>:<BR/><BR/>It pertains to a anti-speeding campaign being launched by the <I>Roads and Traffic Authority</I>.<BR/><BR/>Quoting <A HREF="http://www.news.com.au/sundaytelegraph/story/0,22049,22189442-5006009,00.html" REL="nofollow">Linda Silmalis, 'Blokes point finger at RTA', <I>Sunday Telegraph</I>, (5 August 2007)</A> (@ 5 August 2007):<BR/><BR/>'<I>The gesture, designed to symbolise a male with a small penis, is part of a strategy adopted by the RTA to make speeding "uncool".<BR/><BR/>'But the advertisement, aired for the first time last month, has raised the ire of some male viewers, who feel it is demeaning. <BR/><BR/>'In the five weeks it has been on air, the advertisement has been attracting about one complaint a day.<BR/><BR/>'In a letter to the RTA, the Advertising Standards Bureau said it had received the complaints, although it would not be taking any action.<BR/><BR/>'An RTA spokesman said the authority had also received numerous complaints.<BR/><BR/>'But it would also not be scrapping or modifying its campaign.<BR/><BR/>'The spokesman said the complaints were predominantly from men who had found the advertisement demeaning.</I>'<BR/><BR/>If this was a campaign targeting women, and making allusions to their, say, breast size, one does not have to be a genious to predict the speed at which the adds would be torn down.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-13589051410644256062007-07-05T23:52:00.000+10:002007-07-05T23:52:00.000+10:00I agree with you only to the extent that governmen...<I>I agree with you only to the extent that government should not legislate morality</I><BR/><BR/>Then what else can it legislate? The only thing that does need legislating is precisely morality. In fact, you go on to name two things that are morality legislation - murder and ruining another's good name. Legislating morality (discrimination, theft, murder, etc.) is the government's job. The trick is getting the government to strike the proper balance between enforcing a minimal level of morality and allowing sufficient levels of freedom. It is a balance that gets more difficult to maintain with the middle issues - like sexually suggestive advertising. How far is too far? But like it or not, a line has to be drawn.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-74820436004965442422007-06-26T23:26:00.000+10:002007-06-26T23:26:00.000+10:00So what are we going to do about it? Has anyone co...So what are we going to do about it? <BR/><BR/>Has anyone contacted any MPs? I have sent an email to the Minister of womens right and now will send another to the Communications Minister.<BR/><BR/>If you want the Biased Self Regulation Abolished, we need all the support we can get from you the community and most importantly any one from the goverment that is willing to listen and investigate our claims.<BR/><BR/>The credibilaty of the ASB system and their decision making is in doubt.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-71049160235671102142007-06-26T10:15:00.000+10:002007-06-26T10:15:00.000+10:00Well put Kilroy.Bobby.NWell put Kilroy.<BR/><BR/>Bobby.NBobby.Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11494573597598152422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-59191452293792806212007-06-25T10:27:00.000+10:002007-06-25T10:27:00.000+10:00Dear Anonymous of Sunday, 24 June 2007 07:41:00 PM...Dear Anonymous of <I>Sunday, 24 June 2007 07:41:00 PM EST</I>,<BR/><BR/>Re: "<I>To the person ABOVE....GET YOU FACTS RIGHT...</I>"<BR/><BR/>Sorry mate but I don't really listen to people when they yell. Change your tone and perhaps next time I'll bother reading the rest of your post.<BR/><BR/>Faithfully.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-24726163894092920102007-06-24T21:36:00.000+10:002007-06-24T21:36:00.000+10:00One thing we can do as suggested is raise our conc...One thing we can do as suggested is raise our concerns by contacting local MPs or grovernment perhaps, Minister for Sex discrimination, Minister for Womens Rights, Minister of Communications ..ect... or even John Howard himself! <BR/><BR/>In a way, i say Thank you for dismissing this ad...I know i hate it just as everyone else, BUT this has EXPOSED the ASB Board for what they really are..a JOKE!<BR/><BR/>I am all for a fight with the ASB, it's being a long time coming...BRING IT ON!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-63342068025058300322007-06-24T21:23:00.000+10:002007-06-24T21:23:00.000+10:00I think the gentleman above has a point. But, What...I think the gentleman above has a point. But, What can be done? Because this rulling has sent a whole new message to advertisers about their OVERTLY use of sex and portrayal of women in general. I am worried what this means to other advertisers and what message is this sending to the community? The Board has LOST touch with COMMUNITY VALUES and probably needs to do their own research in this particular field. <BR/><BR/>The ASB Self regulation has been under fire for a number of years now. This latest decision, has just reinforced all the critisms it recieved. So perhaps, it is time for a CHANGE. <BR/><BR/>The Self Regulation is FAILING the PUBLIC.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-90610538652531485592007-06-24T21:17:00.000+10:002007-06-24T21:17:00.000+10:00I have made a handful of complaints to the ASB. Th...I have made a handful of complaints to the ASB. They usually judge ads by "prevailing community attitudes", as they perceive them. So they don't set standards, they in fact follow them.<BR/><BR/>Some of my complaints were of ads demonstrating unlawful behaviour - encouraging anti-social behaviour. Unlawful behaviour in ads is a breach of their ethics. Yet they ignored this because the prevailing community attitude was to break the law.<BR/><BR/>The ASB and advertising companies are caught in a feedback loop. The advertisers stretch the boundaries of acceptable behaviour, it slips by the ASB who only ban ads "way out there". Those ads then set the new prevailing attitudes, and on and on the morals shift.<BR/><BR/>"Entertainment shapes the land, the way the hammer shapes the hand". I have written to the police department to indicate the ASB is encouraging unlawful behaviour - I got nowhere.<BR/><BR/>In regards to overtly sexy ads, I guess you have to write to politicians and hope you can find someone prepared to uphold some standards.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-30768036403311049382007-06-24T21:09:00.000+10:002007-06-24T21:09:00.000+10:00Anonymous, you were a bit "ad hominous" in your re...Anonymous, you were a bit "ad hominous" in your reply to Kilroy. <BR/><BR/>The Nando's commercial attracted over 200 complaints. Kilroy is right that this is not a massive number in itself; however it's a lot more complaints than are usually registered, so it ought to have triggered concern on the part of the ASB board.<BR/><BR/>The ideal outcome would be for the Government to force change on the ASB, either through changing the composition of the board, or by toughening the criteria by which the board makes its decisions.<BR/><BR/>I'm sceptical, though, that the Government will make the changes. They've had a long time to do so; you would think it would have been done by now if it was going to happen.<BR/><BR/>So pressure for change will probably have to come from from other sources; from the general public and the media.<BR/><BR/>I notice that the Herald Sun ran an article today attacking the Board over the Nando's decision on grounds very similar to the ones I made.<BR/><BR/>So maybe the Board has "exposed" itself by running too far ideologically beyond what's likely to be accepted.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-77427651974338912732007-06-24T19:41:00.000+10:002007-06-24T19:41:00.000+10:00To the person ABOVE....GET YOU FACTS RIGHT...'A LA...To the person ABOVE....GET YOU FACTS RIGHT...<BR/><BR/>'A LARGE AMOUNT OF COMPLAINTS'...That were the EXACT WORDS THE ASB USED IN THEIR DESCRIPTION..THEY ARE NOT MY WORDS.<BR/><BR/>CAN YOU READ PROPERLY? Go back and have a GOOD read as to what they say. This is THE PROBLEM!!<BR/>Their so called 'CODE OF ETHICS'...to be DEBATED. And their soft approach to GENDER PORTRAYAL..ie SEXISM.<BR/><BR/>Rest assured, WE (THE COMMUNITY) WILL FIGHT FOR OUR SAY AND OUR RIGHTS TO BE HEARD. WE WILL TAKE THIS MATTER FURTHER...REGARDLESS.<BR/><BR/>The ASB is a bunch of CONTRACTDICTIVE HIPPOCRITS!! JUST LISTEN TO THE RESPONSES THEY GIVE TO COMPLAINTS DISMISSED. IT IS A JOKE...Unfortunately WE ARE NOT LAUGHING THIS TIME!<BR/><BR/>ACTION IS NEEDED TO REGULATE AS THE ASB IS UNABLE TO DO THAT THEMSELVES...THE HISTORY OF THEIR CASES PROVES THE COMMUNITIES CONCERNS ARE VALID AND NEED TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSELY.<BR/><BR/>I AM HERE FOR A FIGHT AGAINST THE COMMUNITIES RIGHTS AS CITIZENS TO BE HEARD FAIRLY. OK?? NOT BY A BUNCH OF BIAS PEOPLE FROM THE SAME ADVERTISING INDUSTRY.<BR/><BR/>THIS WON'T GO DOWN WITH OUT A FIGHT.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-68791760142472489692007-06-24T18:35:00.000+10:002007-06-24T18:35:00.000+10:00In re: Anonymous of Sunday, 24 June 2007 10:11:00 ...In re: Anonymous of <I>Sunday, 24 June 2007 10:11:00 AM EST</I><BR/><BR/>Although I agree with the gist of your concern, I think you have confused a few things here.<BR/><BR/><B>1.</B> Unless the <I>Australian Standards Bureau</I> received a couple of million complaints, I don't think it could be said that '<I>a large proportion of the community found this add offensive</I>' to the point where ceonsory action was <I>mandated</I>. This is because a significant proportion of the community will always find something 'offensive' no matter what it is; the case in point are the militant homosexual, feminist and now Muslim pressure groups that seem to be the darling of the leftist commentariat: they are always portrayed as representative of progressive, enlightened, and by implication, mock-majoritarian views. The <I>Bureau</I> is mandated to take censorial action when the criteria under which acceptable media standards are objectively breached. Mr. Richardson's discussion of the <I>Bureau</I>'s determination regarding <I>Nandos</I> shows how left-libertarian ideology has clouded the <I>Bureau</I>'s professionalism.<BR/><BR/><B>2.</B> The community is being listened to, just like it was with the overwhelming opposition to legalising RU486 by the <I>Commonwealth Senate Standing Committee</I> on that issue. It's just that the community is being ignored, just like it was on RU486.<BR/><BR/><B>3.</B> Abolishing the <I>Bureau</I> isn't the answer, just like abolishing the <I>Australian Broadcasting Corporation</I> isn't the answer to kill media bias against conservative issues. <B>This is a question of culture. The culture must change.</B> If the PM is taking an interventionist approach to the Bantustans in the Northern Territory because the powers that be (were) have failed, it may also be useful to apply the same approach to kick the <I>Bureau</I> back into shape.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-4213829997892984492007-06-24T10:11:00.000+10:002007-06-24T10:11:00.000+10:00Ok, Listen kids.The ASB recieved a LARGE amount of...Ok, Listen kids.<BR/><BR/>The ASB recieved a LARGE amount of complaints for this advert. To me, showing that a LARGE proportion of the COMMUNITY found this ad OFFENSIVE and did not comply with COMMUNITY VALUES. Which brings me to the question.<BR/>WHY DO WE HAVE THE ASB, WHEN THEY DO NOT LISTEN TO THE LARGE AMOUNT OF COMPLAINTS MADE BY US ?? <BR/><BR/>The GOVERMENT needs to step in..and take over...THE ASB IS CLEARLY NOT WORKING and WE AS PEOPLE ARE NOT BEING HEARD ANYWAY! Wasn't that the point of having self - regulation is to be given a fair chance and give us the community a say?? WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED?<BR/><BR/>MP Need to get cracking with this issue..<BR/><BR/>GET RID OF THE USELESS ASB FOR GOOD!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-91669883651575188532007-06-24T02:38:00.000+10:002007-06-24T02:38:00.000+10:00Boycott: 'btw "kilroy" above quotes an article by ...Boycott: '<I>btw "kilroy" above quotes an article by "Richard Ralphsmith" who is himself one of the designers of the Nandos commercial.</I>' <BR/><BR/>Is that so? I had no idea.<BR/><BR/>... be that as it may, a few words concerning the <A HREF="http://www.boycottnandos.com/" REL="nofollow"><I>Boycott Nandos Site</I></A>.<BR/><BR/>Firstly, credibility is lost by some of the points under 'reasons' given, <I>viz</I>, 1 - 3, and 6 - 8.<BR/><BR/>I don't know whether 9 is in fact true, if so, this could be used as a far more powerful assault against this company.<BR/><BR/>Points 4 and 5 are really the pertinent grievances that are made against the commercial (not point 1, which is gratuitous).<BR/><BR/>Having said that, the site could very well be developed further and give future industry pause for thought.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-68038278899585887832007-06-23T21:28:00.000+10:002007-06-23T21:28:00.000+10:00What strikes me is how unoriginal the "progressive...<I>What strikes me is how unoriginal the "progressive" creators of such ads have become. They continue to make ads that are laden with sexual innuendo as though that is the only angle in which to sell products and services.</I><BR/><BR/>It's 'cos they can only "think" with their Pink Bits.<BR/><BR/>Anonymous, how hard is it to have appropriate types of advertising at children's movies, huh?<BR/><BR/>If I had been there with my kids, I would have been extremely angry. Well, there it is - I will not allow my children to go to the cinema from now on. No movie experience is worth the corruption of my kids' innocence.<BR/><BR/>You're going totally overboard with your cries of "censorship"!<BR/><BR/>People who can only "think" with their sex organs probably deserve to be the in the thrall of guvvermint.<BR/><BR/><I>You'll be glad to know I'm raising all of my children to be illiberal traditionalists.</I><BR/><BR/>Good work, Jaz!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-73478005530583836142007-06-23T20:20:00.000+10:002007-06-23T20:20:00.000+10:00FRANCIS W. PORRETTO SAID;“The question is whether ...<I>FRANCIS W. PORRETTO SAID;<BR/>“The question is whether we can meet the demands of freedom of speech and the restraint of the State while simultaneously shielding the immature from sights, sounds, and suggestions they're not ready for.<BR/><BR/>It's a tough nut. There may be no solutions. But a renascence of parental responsibility would contribute mightily. Unfortunately, the government-run schools here in the States are doing their best to destroy that influence once and for all -- and they've gone a long way toward their goal.</I><BR/><BR/>Precisely.<BR/>With immoral leftist leftist/feminist laws like ‘childrens rights’ (where a child doesn’t have to do what his/her parents instruct, and can even divorce his/her own parents) – the only person really shaping our children (and culture) is advertising.<BR/><BR/>And feminists & corporations are ecstatic.<BR/><BR/>To the poledancing mother…. “You go girl”.<BR/><BR/>Bobby.NBobby.Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11494573597598152422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-47520068445405907952007-06-23T20:11:00.000+10:002007-06-23T20:11:00.000+10:00BTW Mark,The reason feminists avoid the ‘ethical’ ...BTW Mark,<BR/><BR/>The reason feminists avoid the ‘ethical’ stance on this ad (as with most issies) – is that it would force them to question most of their ideals.<BR/><BR/>Like abortion rights, Affirmative action, marriage, etc…<BR/><BR/>So, they reduce everything to quotas, equality & feelings to get their way.<BR/><BR/>Bobby.NBobby.Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11494573597598152422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-68970128848296995272007-06-23T20:08:00.000+10:002007-06-23T20:08:00.000+10:00"Anonymous" has a point, and a good one, but the t..."Anonymous" has a point, and a good one, but the terrible power of sex both to sell and to force-mature the young is important, too. The question is whether we can meet the demands of freedom of speech and the restraint of the State while simultaneously shielding the immature from sights, sounds, and suggestions they're not ready for.<BR/><BR/>It's a tough nut. There may be no solutions. But a renascence of parental responsibility would contribute mightily. Unfortunately, the government-run schools here in the States are doing their best to destroy that influence once and for all -- and they've gone a long way toward their goal.<BR/><BR/>Marx and Lenin both saw the family as a principal stumbling block. Antonio Gramsci's "long march through the institutions" emphasized education and communications for a very good reason. Food for thought.Francis W. Porrettohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05862584203772592282noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-64876818996481065022007-06-23T20:07:00.000+10:002007-06-23T20:07:00.000+10:00I hate this Nandos commercial so much I've created...I hate this Nandos commercial so much I've created my own <A HREF="http://www.boycottnandos.com" REL="nofollow">Boycott Nandos</A> site. <BR/><BR/>Please visit.<BR/><BR/>btw "kilroy" above quotes an article by "Richard Ralphsmith" who is himself one of the designers of the Nandos commercial.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18077895124516718437noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-39640429405266014422007-06-23T20:06:00.000+10:002007-06-23T20:06:00.000+10:00“If there were an equal amount of Spearmint Rhinos...<I>“If there were an equal amount of Spearmint Rhinos and Gentlewomens' clubs catering to women wanting to look at a parade of buff man-flesh, I'd be in complete agreement.”</I><BR/><BR/>*Sigh*<BR/>I truly weary of feminists and their <B>equality</B> stance.<BR/><BR/>The REASON is precisely because men & women differ in “WANTING” to look at different things. Feminists are saying, “Because WE don’t like it, neither can you.” – which is just childish.<BR/><BR/>These feminists should really start using the abundance of psychiatrists & councilors that they seem so fond of – and do something about their childish insecurities.<BR/><BR/>What I find irritating about these issues is their one-sidedness. I have no problem with women being (so-called) ‘sexist’ towards men, as long as WE AN DO IT TOO.<BR/><BR/>That’s what gets me.<BR/><BR/>It’s the ‘nyah, nyah, nyah’ (poking) attitude of these feminists that unashamedly treat men like dirt, - while the notion is that we must treat women with the respect of <B>religion</B>.<BR/><BR/>It really appears that <I>‘what’s good for the gander is not ALLOWED for the goose’</I>.<BR/><BR/>Bobby.NBobby.Nhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11494573597598152422noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-25438148272963000752007-06-23T15:24:00.000+10:002007-06-23T15:24:00.000+10:00Another point to make is that many people when cri...Another point to make is that many people when criticising the portrayal of women in ads like Nando's resort to feminist terminology and complain about "sexism".<BR/><BR/>It's not a terminology which helps much, though. It shifts attention from the inherent rightness or wrongness of what is portrayed and instead focuses on issues of discrimination or power balance.<BR/><BR/>It means that the criticism can be undercut if it can be shown (and it usually can) that men too are portrayed in similar ways, or that the women are being portrayed as being "empowered" or "in control".<BR/><BR/>I noticed for instance that the attempt to criticise the Nando's ad at the left-wing, feminist site Larvatus Prodeo finally came down to this:<BR/><BR/>"I'd agree with you heartily [that using poledancing to sell stuff is a wonderful expression of democratic rights] if the traffic was equal and two way. If there were an equal amount of Spearmint Rhinos and Gentlewomens' clubs catering to women wanting to look at a parade of buff man-flesh, I'd be in complete agreement."<BR/><BR/>So the "sexism" argument holds no in principle objection to what's happening - just a complaint about something else - about power relations.<BR/><BR/>I don't find it surprising that the feminist approach hasn't had much influence in such matters. It seems to be largely ignored.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-24728073629608138712007-06-23T12:11:00.000+10:002007-06-23T12:11:00.000+10:00Jazz:I love your work!Anonymous:You're position is...Jazz:<BR/><BR/>I love your work!<BR/><BR/>Anonymous:<BR/><BR/>You're position is liberal-permissive. Without a strong moral backbone, this libertarianism will act on the weaknesses of most, and lead to a loss of ethics and the degeneracy of interpersonal attitudes among citizens. Government's role <I>is not</I> to be a "nanny", <B>but</B> <I>it does</I> have a responsibility to <I>govern</I>. Sometimes a paternalistic reaction is called for.<BR/><BR/>An example is Howard's recent interventionism with respect to the decrepit state of aboriginal communities in the Northern Territory. Predictably, the left has come out in unison to denounce it as "<I>racist</I>" (funnily enough, when the government took the position that the communities were autonomous, the commentariate denounced Canberra as "<I>negligent</I>" in allowing evil to reign free in these self-imposed Australian Bantustans).<BR/><BR/>I agree with you only to the extent that government should not legislate morality, but I depart from your liberal stance when you suggest that government has no right to enforce standards. If that were true, the natural conclusion would be to repeal criminal and defamation law. Clearly, this is a nonsense position; you should abandon it.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-6499425162283169272007-06-23T11:52:00.000+10:002007-06-23T11:52:00.000+10:00Anonymous, I would much prefer that moral standard...Anonymous, I would much prefer that moral standards were upheld voluntary by the individuals of a community, rather than by state bureaucrats.<BR/><BR/>This is a more realistic option, though, when there is a shared moral code which encourages people to act virtuously.<BR/><BR/>It's a less realistic option when you live in a society in which such codes are thought of negatively as restraints, and what is thought to matter is autonomy rather than virtue.<BR/><BR/>In such a society there is nothing that will uphold a community standard.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-46675919490958080412007-06-23T08:27:00.000+10:002007-06-23T08:27:00.000+10:00Thordaddy, your comment reminds me of Erik von Kue...Thordaddy, your comment reminds me of Erik von Kuehnelt-Leddihn's listing of characteristics of leftism (in _Leftism Revisited_). One of them: Liberty--below the belt. It's become a monomania with those who want no constraints on life, and suggests a form of slavery. St. Augustine was quite right when he said, "The good man, even though he is a servant, is free: the wicked man, even though he is a king, is a servant. He has as many masters as he has vices" (The City of God).<BR/><BR/>Anon, I don't think you quite understood my point, but you bang out a standard "no limits!" line typical of liberalism. I don't think you understand a proper role of government in the good society, but I reckon that's a problem we live with since the West is so disordered. <BR/><BR/>You'll be glad to know I'm raising all of my children to be illiberal traditionalists.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-78246284395590321592007-06-23T07:32:00.000+10:002007-06-23T07:32:00.000+10:00I'm glad I wasn't the only one that found this ad ...I'm glad I wasn't the only one that found this ad offputting. Frankly I found it ludicrous; whatever it was advertising was lost on me.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6832901.post-53908697724342111872007-06-23T06:37:00.000+10:002007-06-23T06:37:00.000+10:00What strikes me is how unoriginal the "progressive...What strikes me is how unoriginal the "progressive" creators of such ads have become. They continue to make ads that are laden with sexual innuendo as though that is the only angle in which to sell products and services. Perhaps sexual innuendo <I>is</I> the only way to sell to "progressives" these days? "Progressives" just can't seem to respond to anything more substantive?Thordaddyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15887901925655428541noreply@blogger.com